Feasibility of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Early-Stage Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been widely adopted in the management of early-stage gynaecological cancers such as endometrial, vulvar and cervical cancer. Comprehensive surgical staging is crucial for patients with early-stage ovarian cancer and currently, that includes bilateral pelvic and para-aortic lymph node assessment. SLNB allows the identification, excision and pathological assessment of the first draining lymph nodes, thus negating the need for a full lymphadenectomy. We systematically searched the MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases (from inception to 3 November 2022) in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). Our search identified 153 articles from which 11 were eligible for inclusion. Patients with clinical stage I-II ovarian cancer undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy were included. Statistical analysis was performed in RStudio using the meta package, where meta-analysis was performed for the detection. The risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies C (QUADAS-C) tool. Overall, 11 observational studies met the predetermined criteria and these included 194 women. The meta-analysis showed that the detection rate of sentinel lymph nodes in early-stage ovarian cancer was 94% (95% CI of 86% to 1.00%). Significant heterogeneity was noted among the studies with Q = 47.6, p < 0.0001, I2 = 79% and τ2 = 0.02. Sentinel lymph nodes in early-stage ovarian cancer have a high detection rate and can potentially have applicability in clinical practice. However, considering the small number of participants in the studies, the heterogeneity among them and the low quality of evidence, the results should be interpreted with caution. Larger trials are needed before a change in clinical practice is recommended.

Tubo-ovarian abscess: A proposed new scoring system to guide clinical management.

OBJECTIVE: To create a risk scoring system comprised of clinical and radiological characteristics that can predict the likelihood of antibiotic treatment failure of tubo-ovarian abscesses. The score should guide clinicians in identifying patients to whom early intervention should be offered instead of a prolonged trial of antibiotics. METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study carried out between January 1, 2013 and September 30, 2019, identified consecutive patients with tubo-ovarian abscess. Using a chronological split, patients were allocated to two groups for the development and subsequent validation of the postulated scoring system. Univariate and bivariate analyses were performed to identify statistically significant variables for the failure of intravenous antibiotic treatment. RESULTS: In total, 214 consecutive patients with tubo-ovarian abscesses were identified. Data from the first 150 patients were used for the development of the postulated scoring system; data from the subsequent 64 patients were used for validation. Statistically significant clinical features between those having successful and unsuccessful management were: temperature (median = 37.1℃ vs 38.2℃, P = 0.0001), C-reactive protein (151 mg/L vs 243 mg/L, P = 0.0001), and tubo-ovarian abscess diameter (6.0 cm vs 8.0 cm, P = 0.0001). These parameters were used to create a risk prediction score. A score of four or more was predictive of requiring surgical/radiological intervention of tubo-ovarian abscess (P < 0.001). The score had a sensitivity of 69% and a specificity of 88%, with area under the curve (AUC) = 0.859. CONCLUSION: Currently, there is no guidance for clinicians on when to operate on a tubo-ovarian abscess. Our prediction score is simple, using only three easily obtained clinical characteristics.

"Contemplating the Next Maneuver": Functional Neuroimaging Reveals Intraoperative Decision-making Strategies.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate differences in the quality, confidence, and consistency of intraoperative surgical decision making (DM) and using functional neuroimaging expose decision systems that operators use. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Novices are hypothesized to use conscious analysis (effortful DM) leading to activation across the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, whereas experts are expected to use unconscious automation (habitual DM) in which decisions are recognition-primed and prefrontal cortex independent. METHODS: A total of 22 subjects (10 medical student novices, 7 residents, and 5 attendings) reviewed simulated laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos, determined the next safest operative maneuver upon video termination (10 s), and reported decision confidence. Video paradigms either declared ("primed") or withheld ("unprimed") the next operative maneuver. Simultaneously, changes in cortical oxygenated hemoglobin and deoxygenated hemoglobin inferring prefrontal activation were recorded using Optical Topography. Decision confidence, consistency (primed vs unprimed), and quality (script concordance) were assessed. RESULTS: Attendings and residents were significantly more certain (P < 0.001), and decision quality was superior (script concordance: attendings = 90%, residents = 78.3%, and novices = 53.3%). Decision consistency was significantly superior in experts (P < 0.001) and residents (P < 0.05) than novices (P = 0.183). During unprimed DM, novices showed significant activation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, whereas this activation pattern was not observed among residents and attendings. During primed DM, significant activation was not observed in any group. CONCLUSIONS: Expert DM is characterized by improved quality, consistency, and confidence. The findings imply attendings use a habitual decision system, whereas novices use an effortful approach under uncertainty. In the presence of operative cues (primes), novices disengage the prefrontal cortex and seem to accept the observed operative decision as correct.

The diagnostic yield of preoperative staging computed tomography of the thorax in colorectal cancer patients without hepatic metastases.

BACKGROUND: National UK guidelines recommend preoperative computed tomography (CT) examination of the chest for all patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) as identification of thoracic metastatic disease may influence treatment plans. The diagnostic yield of this approach for patients without radiological evidence of hepatic metastases remains unclear. The aim of this study was to establish the impact upon treatment of chest CT examination for CRC patients without metastatic liver disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients diagnosed with CRC without liver metastases disease between December 2006 and December 2013 in a single institution were identified from a prospectively recorded departmental database. Data collected included patient demographics, disease stage and chest CT findings. RESULTS: There were 358 CRC patients (183 male, 175 female, median age 70 years, range 24-96 years) without liver metastases. Colon cancer accounted for 68% of cases with 32% of patients diagnosed with rectal cancer. The majority of patients (n=292, 81.6%) had no evidence of thoracic pathology during the study period. Lung metastases were identified in five (1.4%) patients, one of them subsequently diagnosed with benign pulmonary nodule. In 61 (17.0%) patients the lung nodules were classified as intermediate with only three subsequently reclassified as pulmonary metastases (n=1) or primary lung cancer (n=2). CONCLUSION: In the absence of liver metastases, CRC rarely spreads to the lung. Consequently, preoperative chest CT examination for patients without evidence of liver metastases may not be necessary in the majority of patients. Future studies are required to identify patients at high risk for pulmonary metastases who may benefit from this preoperative investigation.

Endoscopic breast surgery: where are we now and what might the future hold for video-assisted breast surgery?

Endoscopic surgery has been extensively used for many surgical conditions and has gained acceptance as an alternative and less invasive approach to open surgery. However, minimal access endoscopic techniques have yet to be translated into mainstream clinical practice in breast surgery. More recently, technical innovations have made it feasible to conduct endoscopic breast cancer resection, with or without breast reconstruction, through wounds inconspicuously hidden in the axilla and periareolar region. Several clinical trials have now been conducted to demonstrate technical feasibility, assess safety and provide follow up data regarding oncological success of endoscopic breast surgery. This primary aim was to critically evaluate the literature in order to determine the oncological and cosmetic efficacy of endoscopic breast surgery. A systematic review was conducted using Medline, Ovid and Embase to identify original data from studies of endoscopic breast surgery. Initial results have demonstrated that endoscopic breast surgery is safe and technically feasible. Early data suggests that it is possible to achieve disease control with high rates of overall survival and low rates of local relapse recurrence and/or distant metastases. However, the absence of level I randomised clinical evidence currently precludes a recommendation that endoscopic breast cancer surgery is capable of achieving equivalent oncological outcomes to open surgery.